Quantum Of Solace Plot Summary Movie Reviewers I#
Quantum Of Solace Plot Summary Series Produced By#

Quantum Of Solace Plot Summary Series Produced By

The sequel's storyline was created by producer Michael G. Quantum of Solace is the twenty-second film in the James Bond series produced by EON Productions. Bond traces this assassins contacts to. Before he can get him to talk, however, one of his own partners kills the captive and tries to kill Bond, revealing the depths of Quantum. James Bond, Great Britains top spy, has captured a member of the top-secret criminal organization called Quantum. Detailed plot synopsis reviews of Quantum of Solace.

16 Image copyright problem with File:CA1208cover-James Bond.jpgMay I ask why this page was moved from Quantum of Solace to Quantum of Solace (film)?I was going to ask yesterday, but I thought someone would have reverted it by now.MJisnotmylover gave the reason 'over redirect'. 14 Discussion pertaining to non-free image(s) used in article While he and M interrogate White, they are attacked by the traitorous MI6 agent Henry Mitchell, who is killed by Bond while White escapes.

Peppage ( talk) 07:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Gee, why would we follow standard naming conventions? Some guy ( talk) 08:15, 14 December 2008 (UTC) OK, I understand, may I suggest you give better descriptions in the edit summary, when moving pages. It's worked for those films, it will work for this film, and will continue to work in the future. Yes it was a short story, but it dosen't have a article on itself.And the top of this article adequately links to the disambiguation page.So I request an administrator re-move back to Quantum of Solace, or I will requested it on Requested Moves in a day, if no response.The Windler talk 07:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC) Why can't it just follow the same standards as the other films? Which is I believe as you're describing it, page is Quantum of Solace and there is a link to the disambiguation page.

Even if the rivers were underground, someone must have noticed the equipment and personnel and people talk.2. What are the possibilities of someone building dams to dam up a river without anyone else knowing it? I am refering to the damming up of Bolivia's water supply. I don't have confidence in whether or not the stuff I want to put there is encyclopedic.1. Czech Out ☎ | ✍ 17:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Reasonable to have a section on technical impossibilitiesIs it at all possible to have a section talking about technical impossibilities in this film?I want to ask the question here before I go ahead and make changes in the article itself. If it does by now, fine—but let's get that fact cited, please.

The picture showed steel staircases going up as if they were untreated plywood.Allyn ( talk) 03:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC) It's not possible to have a section about the film's technical impossibilities without reliable sources. Sure, I understand whay the fuel cells would go, but what was there to burn. The futuristic hotel burining near the end blew my mind. Why does a cement and steel building burn as if it's made out of untreated wood. What are the odds with two people grabbing each other and being supported by one parachute, especially when their descent is slowed just before contact?3.

contrib) 03:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC) I agree with Erik furthermore, so many films ask the viewer to suspend disbelief. Maybe there are some out there for this James Bond film, but I would think that there is suspension of disbelief for how all James Bond films unfold. Many films have technical impossibilities, but not all of them are thoroughly examined for them.

- 110.174.169.36 ( talk) 06:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC) DVD review I don't think free-burning hydrogen is hot enough, however. By the way, it is actually possible for steel to literally burn, directly, without liquefying, if it is suddenly exposed to an extremely high temperature source. The only thing I thought was clever (or even good at all) about this film was the fact that as that fight sequence went on (and on.and on.) everything got WET, which was accurate for hydrogen burning freely in air. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.201.65 ( talk) 08:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Maybe those 'steel staircases' were meant to be plywood ? - Beardo ( talk) 19:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Actually I got the impression it was just the free Hydrogen burning. Neverwake ( talk) 00:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Tandem parachuting it quite common so as far as question 2 one parachute supporting two people is not an impossibility.

Quantum Of Solace Plot Summary Movie Reviewers I

All the other reviews listed are from people known firstly as film reviewers. Since neither of these people are known as film critics or movie reviewers I deleted them. Delete it? Chriszwolle ( talk) 21:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Obviously politically motivated reviews.The reviews from Mona Charen and Juan Cole can only serve to fire up political bases. Cliff smith talk 00:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC) This Bond film is known as one of the best Bond films ever made.Sounds a bit dubious to me, no source, seems to be like someone's personal opinion.

Nothing was added digitally. Does anyone know whatwas actually meant by the line? harlock_jds ( talk) 04:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC) I think they meant all of the fire was real, all of the explosions and things. CGI is always postproduction and the idea of on set CGI is silly. You could call them political columnists/journalists or something?Japanscot ( talk) 23:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC) On set CGI?The statement 'No CGI was used on set by for the burning interior sequence' doesn't make much sence.

Government official, says as much in the movie. The movie explicitly ditches any suggestion that 'we' (the anglo-Americans) are automatically the good guys: one of the characters, a U.K. Instead he comes into direct or indirect conflict with all of a) the CIA, b) the wishes of ministers (including the PM) of the U.K., c) a green-washed capitalist, and d) a dictator-in-waiting who, with the nod of (an element of) the US government, is aiming to overthrow a democratic government. Nambutu in Casino Royale). Should not the reverse also be the case? There has been an ongoing battle between privatization/enclosure and nationalization/local control of basic resources (including water) in South America over the last decade and this theme forms part of the background to the movie.It seems significant (or at least interesting) that this movie appears to move Bond away from confronting (more or less) comic book villains and invented terrorist organizations (working for invented countries, i.e.